DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
JSR
Docket No. 7418-12
3 October 2012
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Tos Secretary of the Navy
EVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Lae
Fncl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 2 Jul 12 w/attachments
il
(2) HOMC MIQ memo dtd 12 Sep 12 w/enclosure
(3) Subject's naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with
this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval
record be corrected by removing the service record page 11
(“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 2 April 2004, a
copy of which is at Tab A.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Gorenflo, Grover and
Midboe, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 3 October 2012, and pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on
the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the
Headquarters Marine Corps office having cognizance over the
subject matter of Petitioner's case has commented to the effect
that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.
c. The page 11 on which the contested entry appears also
includes an uncontested entry.
| CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an error and injustice warranting the
following corrective action:
RECOMMENDATION :
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing
the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)")
entry dated 2 April 2004. This is to be accomplished by
reconstructing the page 11 on which the entry appears, or
completely obliterating the entry so it cannot be read, rather
than merely lining through it.
b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.
c. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder
SS ee ll
lh 17 x= _ = [eo 1 ee
= 0 (ea) J | ae
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
WR enQ >, Dd ———
Fo_Ww. DEAN EIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 03039 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”") entry dated 10 November 2010, a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Gorenflo, Grover and Midboe, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 3 October 2012, and pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5272 14
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 November 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. e. In enclosure (6), MIQ again commented to the effect that the contested entry dated 6 January 2012 should stand, but further commented to the effect that Petitioner’s request to remove the entries dated 14 December...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6393 14
damarv 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a} 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 20 September 2012 {copy at Tab #). The Board, fe sens sions of error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5737 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HD Docket No. NR5737-14 29 January 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy subj: EE osc, oo a REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (ay 16 0.8
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8068 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 SS. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JSR Docket No. NR8068-13 19 June 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj:
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5328 14
1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 21 Mar 14 w/attachments (2) HOMC MIO memos dtd 3 Nov 14 and 6 Jan 15 (3) Subject's naval record i. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)"”) entry dated 29 March 2010 {copy at Tab A). over your max wt) .” CONCLUSION: Upon review and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10191 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)"”) entry dated 13 September 2011 (copy at Tab A). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Genteman and Marquez and Ms. Zivnuska, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 March 2013, and pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6848 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the illegible service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an error warranting the following corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3747 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 10 May 2011 (copy at Tab A}. The Board, consisting of Ms. Trucco and Messrs. Chapman and Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 16 October 2014, and pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6355 14
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD 1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. ee reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 19 February 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 6 April 2006.